Strzok question the entire premise of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump Campaign and make it even more outrageous that the Mueller team continued this investigation for almost two and a half years. media to their earlier reporting on the so-called Steele dossier underscores the need for transparency to maintain credibility and the audience’s trust, analysts say. “Secondly, the comments of Peter Strzok regarding the February 14 New York Times article are devastating in that they are an admission that there was no reliable evidence that anyone from the Trump Campaign was working with Russian Intelligence Agencies in any form," Graham explained. “The statements by Mr. The FBI wrote, Steele said Fiona Hill knows that the primary subsource,' identified as U.S.-based and Russian-trained lawyer Igor Danchenko, 'was involved in the dossier, and when the. flashback: newly declassified intel document noted steele dossier claims had 'limited corroboration' The FBI’s investigation was handed off to Special Counsel Robert Mueller after Trump was elected. Tom McClintock (R-CA) that the Steele dossier has never been corroborated. “Most importantly after this interview of the sub-source and the subsequent memo detailing the contents of the interview, it was a miscarriage of justice for the FBI and the Department of Justice to continue to seek a FISA warrant against Carter Page in April and June of 2017.” A Trump administration official was a key link between Christopher Steele and his primary source for his dossier on Donald Trump, according to newly declassified documents. Former Special Counsel John Durham at a Congressional hearing on Wednesday told Rep.
“What have we learned from the release of these two documents by the Department of Justice? Number one, it is clear to me that the memo regarding the FBI interview of the primary sub-source in January 2017 should have required the system to stop and reevaluate the case against Mr.
0 kommentar(er)
